Sonic vs Ethereum
Sonic and Ethereum both run the EVM and use ERC-20 with MetaMask — but fees and speed are very different. Here is how they compare for launching a token.
Quick comparison
| Sonic | Ethereum | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | EVM layer-1 | EVM layer-1 |
| Token standard | ERC-20 | ERC-20 |
| Gas coin | S | ETH |
| Typical fee | Very low | $2 – $15+ |
| Speed | Sub-second, ~10k TPS | ~15 s+ |
Same standard, very different cost
Both use ERC-20 and MetaMask, so your token works the same way on either. The difference is cost and speed: Sonic is sub-second and costs a fraction of a cent, while Ethereum mainnet can cost several dollars per transaction. For affordable, fast launches Sonic wins clearly.
Liquidity & reach
Ethereum has the largest liquidity and the widest exchange support — the safe default for serious, high-value projects. Sonic is newer with very high performance and low fees. Pick Ethereum for maximum reach, Sonic for cheap, fast launches.
Which should you choose?
Choose Ethereum for maximum liquidity and ERC-20 ubiquity (budget for higher gas). Choose Sonic for the same ERC-20 standard at a fraction of the cost. Launch on either: create on Sonic or create on Ethereum.
Frequently asked questions
Do Sonic and Ethereum use the same standard?
Yes — both use ERC-20 and MetaMask, so your token works the same way on either chain.
Is Sonic cheaper than Ethereum?
Yes — dramatically. Sonic fees are a fraction of a cent, while Ethereum mainnet often costs several dollars.
When should I still pick Ethereum?
When you need maximum liquidity and the widest exchange support, and can accept higher fees.
Ready to create your Sonic token?
Launch a verified ERC-20 on Sonic — no code, very low fees, sub-second finality, in minutes.
Create your token